This site should behave like a real product with supporting editorial guidance, not like a pile of disconnected keyword pages. The editorial standard is simple: content should exist because it helps a user complete a real resume task more effectively.
Indexed pages should connect directly to resume analysis, ATS readability, job-match checks, rewrite decisions, or closely related application tasks. If a page cannot help with a real workflow, it should not stay prominent just for traffic.
Slightly renamed pages around the same intent should not stay thin or repetitive. If a page targets a different search phrase, it still needs distinct guidance, original explanation, and a credible workflow connection.
The site can use AI-assisted drafts, summaries, or workflow support, but indexed content should still be reviewed for originality, usefulness, truthful claims, and fit with the actual product behavior.
Important guides should show who is responsible, when they were updated, and what practical task they are meant to help users complete.
If a page overlaps too heavily with a stronger page, the first choice is to improve its uniqueness, depth, and workflow value instead of leaving it as a near-duplicate.
If an article is too broad, generic, or unsupported, it should be revised with clearer examples, stronger claims discipline, and more useful next steps instead of left live as filler.
Search visibility should follow quality, not the other way around.