This site should behave like a real product with supporting editorial guidance, not like a pile of disconnected keyword pages. The editorial standard is simple: content should exist because it helps a user complete a real resume task more effectively.
Indexed pages should connect directly to resume analysis, ATS readability, job-match checks, rewrite decisions, or closely related application tasks. If a page cannot help with a real workflow, it should not stay prominent just for traffic.
Slightly renamed pages around the same intent should not all be treated as primary indexed assets. One strong page is better than many weak variants that say similar things.
The site can use AI-assisted drafts, summaries, or workflow support, but indexed content should still be reviewed for originality, usefulness, truthful claims, and fit with the actual product behavior.
Primary guides should show who is responsible, when they were updated, and whether they are still treated as primary indexed content or only as support pages.
If a page overlaps too heavily with a stronger page, it may stay live for navigation or support purposes but should no longer be treated as a primary indexed landing page.
If an article is too broad, generic, or unsupported, it should be updated or removed from the indexable footprint instead of left live as filler.
Search visibility should follow quality, not the other way around.