Step 1
Resume extraction
Uploaded files are parsed to extract text, recover sections, and create the structured input needed for scoring, keyword review, rewrite help, and job-match comparisons.
The goal of this site is not to hand out a mysterious number. It is to help users understand what their resume currently says, how readable it may be to ATS-style systems, and which edits are most worth making before the next application.
Step 1
Uploaded files are parsed to extract text, recover sections, and create the structured input needed for scoring, keyword review, rewrite help, and job-match comparisons.
Step 2
The system checks section naming, readability, formatting clarity, keyword coverage, and the kinds of structure issues that often reduce screening quality.
Step 3
When a job description is added, the workflow compares language, requirements, and emphasis so users can see where the resume aligns, where it is thin, and what needs rewriting.
Step 4
The intended result is a better next draft: clearer rewrite targets, stronger keyword alignment, exportable feedback, and follow-on tools that help users keep improving.
Spotting missing or weak sections before a recruiter does.
Finding vague bullets that should be rewritten around ownership, tools, or outcomes.
Comparing a resume against a specific role so the language and emphasis fit the target job better.
Creating a cleaner revision loop between analysis, rewrite, export, and re-checking.
No public analyzer can perfectly mirror every employer system or guarantee interviews.
The site provides structured guidance based on the content visible in the uploaded file and common ATS-style patterns.
Users should review outputs manually, keep claims truthful, and make final decisions with human judgment.