| ATS readability | 20 | Whether the text can be read in order: standard sections (contact, experience, education, skills, summary), complete contact details, a profile link, and no layout that scrambles extraction. |
|---|
| Keyword coverage | 18 | How many relevant role and industry terms appear in the text, and whether there is a dedicated skills section. Terms are counted as written, so a missing word means missing text, not a missing skill. |
|---|
| Content quality | 16 | A professional summary, bullets that start with action verbs, and variety in sentence length so the writing does not read as a list of duties. |
|---|
| Presentation | 14 | Clearly labelled sections, consistent date formats and contact details placed at the top. |
|---|
| Skills relevance | 12 | The number of recognisable technical skills and a reasonable balance with soft skills such as leadership and communication. |
|---|
| Experience depth | 10 | Total years of experience that can be read from the dates, and whether the roles show progression. |
|---|
| Measurable results | 6 | Numbers and outcome language in bullets. The tool asks for verified figures and does not reward invented ones. |
|---|
| Completeness | 4 | Whether the essential sections are present, with a small credit for optional ones such as projects or certifications. |
|---|