Free Resume Tool
Run the resume scoring workflow on its own page so you can focus on the score breakdown, details, and practical improvements without the rest of the homepage.
Upload resume
Upload your resume
Drag a file here or choose it from your device.
PDF, DOC, DOCX · Up to 10MB · 6 pages maximum
Basic runs text-based checks only. AI adds a written review when a provider is available; results always name the provider actually used.
If you already analyzed a file on the homepage, this tool reuses that result automatically.
Once your resume is processed, this page will show the focused workflow for this tool.
Supported formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX · Max 10MB
How it works
Analyze your resume and review our score breakdown for structure, content and readability. Use the findings to plan edits, not predict hiring decisions.
A resume score is not valuable because it gives you a number. It is valuable because it helps you identify which sections need work, whether the document is readable enough for ATS systems, and where the fastest improvements are likely to come from.
Job seekers often want to know whether the document is strong before spending time on more applications. A score can help you decide if the resume is ready, if it needs deeper rewriting, or if tailoring and keyword work should come first.
Treat the score as a directional signal, not a final verdict. Use the breakdown to prioritize revisions, then re-check after improving the summary, bullets, section clarity, and target-role alignment.
The score reflects properties of the document that can be checked mechanically: whether sections are identifiable, whether contact details are reachable, whether role language appears, and whether the formatting is likely to survive parsing. It does not observe your competence, your references, or the strength of the applicant pool.
The total is the least useful part of the output. A resume scoring in the seventies because of one formatting problem needs a very different fix from one scoring the same because it has no measurable achievements. Work from the component scores and treat the headline figure as a progress marker.
Some deliberate choices cost points and are still correct. An academic CV carries publication lists that a general parser handles poorly; a senior portfolio may lead with scope rather than metrics. Optimise for the reader you actually want, not for the number.
Treat anything above the mid-seventies as structurally sound and focus your remaining effort on content quality. Below that, the breakdown usually points at one or two fixable problems rather than a rewrite.
Some checks are threshold-based, so a single heading rename or a moved contact line can flip a component from fail to pass. That sensitivity is why the breakdown matters more than the total.
No. It is generated here to help you prioritise edits. Employers run their own systems with their own criteria, which are not visible to any external tool.
It is better treated as a diagnostic signal. It helps estimate resume quality, readability, and readiness, but real hiring outcomes still depend on role fit and competition.
Often yes. Stronger section structure, clearer bullet points, and better keyword placement can improve results without inventing new experience.