Free Resume Tool
Upload your resume, compare it against a real job description, and see where the application needs clearer role language, stronger alignment, or better ATS coverage.
Upload resume
Upload your resume
Drag a file here or choose it from your device.
PDF, DOC, DOCX · Up to 10MB · 6 pages maximum
Basic runs text-based checks only. AI adds a written review when a provider is available; results always name the provider actually used.
If you already analyzed a file on the homepage, this tool reuses that result automatically.
Once your resume is processed, this page will show the focused workflow for this tool.
Supported formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX · Max 10MB
How it works
Compare your analyzed resume with a job description to review keyword overlap, missing terms and role alignment. Use only skills you can support.
Analyze your current resume, then paste the responsibilities and qualifications from the target posting. Review matched terms, missing language and supporting evidence before editing. A missing phrase can reflect different wording, not a missing ability. The result is this tool’s assessment of text alignment, not the employer’s screening score.
Many resumes fail because they are too generic. Recruiters and ATS systems both look for evidence that your experience matches the current opening, not just that you are broadly employable. A stronger resume-to-job-description match improves keyword coverage, relevance, and interview potential.
A useful matcher should show more than missing words. It should help you see whether the summary supports the role, whether your skills section reflects the job language, and whether the experience bullets make your fit obvious enough for both ATS systems and fast recruiter scans.
Use this page when you have a real job description in hand, your resume is getting low response, or you want to improve role-specific tailoring before the next round of applications.
Job adverts mix genuine requirements with aspirational wish lists written by committee. Requirements repeated in different words, mentioned in the title, or placed first are usually real. A single line deep in a nice-to-have section often is not. Separating the two prevents wasted rewriting.
Automated comparison is largely literal. Postgres and PostgreSQL, or K8s and Kubernetes, can read as different terms even though any engineer treats them as identical. Where the employer's form is unambiguous and true of your experience, using their spelling costs nothing and removes a false gap.
A resume touching every listed technology shallowly usually reads worse than one demonstrating real depth in the core requirements. Matching is a filter, not the decision; the interview tests whether the claimed overlap is genuine.
Copy terminology, never sentences. Adopting the employer's word for a technology is sensible; lifting their prose into your resume reads as padding and is easy to spot.
Almost always a vocabulary mismatch rather than a capability one. Check whether the work is described on your resume at all, and whether it uses the words the posting uses.
No. It means the documents align. Shortlisting also depends on volume, timing, and internal candidates, none of which are visible from the advert.
It overlaps with ATS checks, but this page is more specific. It focuses on matching your resume against a target role, not just measuring general resume quality.
You do not need to rewrite everything from scratch, but the strongest applications usually adjust summaries, keywords, and top experience bullets for the target role.