Free Resume Tool
Compare resume language against a target job description, identify missing keywords, and prioritize top fixes before applying.
Upload resume
Upload your resume
Drag a file here or choose it from your device.
PDF, DOC, DOCX · Up to 10MB · 6 pages maximum
Basic runs text-based checks only. AI adds a written review when a provider is available; results always name the provider actually used.
If you already analyzed a file on the homepage, this tool reuses that result automatically.
Once your resume is processed, this page will show the focused workflow for this tool.
Supported formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX · Max 10MB
How it works
Review resume-to-job alignment using your resume analysis and a target job description. Identify relevant terminology and evidence to improve.
A strong match is not just a list of repeated keywords. It should show whether the resume summary supports the target role, whether core skills are easy to find, and whether the experience bullets prove the right kind of impact for the position you want.
Many resumes are broad enough to fit several jobs but not specific enough to win interviews for one. Generic wording makes it harder for ATS systems and recruiters to see immediate fit, especially when they compare your application with candidates who mirror the role language more clearly.
Use the output to revise your summary, top skills, and the first few experience bullets first. Those are usually the highest-visibility areas. Then re-check the match after tailoring so you can confirm the edits improved relevance instead of just making the document longer.
Two candidates with the same background can score very differently because one mirrors the language of the posting and the other does not. Matching is largely a vocabulary problem: if the role asks for orchestration and your resume says containers, a literal matcher sees a gap that a human would not. Comparing against the actual advert surfaces that mismatch before you apply.
Not every missing term deserves a change. Prioritise requirements repeated in the posting, listed under must-have criteria, or named in the job title itself. Ignore generic filler such as team player or fast-paced environment. A short list of genuine, evidenced additions beats a long list of keywords you cannot defend in an interview.
Adding a term you have never used is both dishonest and fragile, because the first technical question exposes it. The stronger move is to find work you have genuinely done and describe it using the vocabulary the employer uses. That is a translation of real experience, not an invention of new experience.
There is no target percentage worth chasing. Cover the repeated must-have requirements and the role title, then stop. Beyond that, extra terms add noise and make the writing worse for the person who ultimately reads it.
Tailor for roles you genuinely want and apply a lighter edit elsewhere. Rewriting from scratch each time is unsustainable; changing the summary, the skills list, and the top few bullets captures most of the benefit for a fraction of the effort.
No. It measures overlap between two documents. Interviews depend on competition, timing, seniority fit, and recruiter judgment, none of which a text comparison can observe.
No. The goal is to reflect the real requirements in accurate language, not to paste the posting into the resume. Strong tailoring keeps your achievements truthful while making role relevance easier to see.
Yes. A strong overall score does not always mean the resume is well targeted to one role. Job match is useful when you want role-specific relevance, not just general resume quality.